112dB Forum

Redline Series => Redline Equalizer => Topic started by: invid4 on March 14, 2010, 09:34:27 PM

Title: any news about a no latency version ?
Post by: invid4 on March 14, 2010, 09:34:27 PM
Hello
I was wondering if there had still any ploan for a no latency version of Redline Eq anytime soon ?
Thank you !
Best regards
Title: Re: any news about a no latency version ?
Post by: Mljung on May 28, 2010, 11:04:11 AM
I wanna know too - Redline EQ is somewhat slow, I would adore a no latency switch!

Kind regards,
Mads
Title: Re: any news about a no latency version ?
Post by: dj! on May 29, 2010, 01:53:42 AM
A no- or low-latency mode is definitely planned for v2, but I can't give an ETA at this point.

Take care,

-- dj!
Title: Re: any news about a no latency version ?
Post by: Cubasemastersx on June 03, 2010, 04:54:24 PM
I wait for this...I hope it comes as sooner as possible...i'm really disappointed with the plugs performance...it sounds good, but protools don't seem to like it...
Title: Re: any news about a no latency version ?
Post by: orbit1 on September 08, 2010, 11:16:26 AM
I really like the 112db stuff so dj, I'm not trying to tell you how to do your job, but a good EQ that can switch from a linear phase/high latency mode to zero latency (non-linear phase) is Fabfilter's Pro Q. You can simply select the operation mode from a little box at the bottom of the window.

I don't imagine this would be too difficult to implement. Of course the colouration would need to be calculated differently. Surely though the differences between models is simple the bell curve and a touch of saturation and wouldn't be too hard to re-jig.

Either way, I'm a fan of the 112dB stuff and once this particular latency issue is sorted with Redline Equaliser, I will add this to my arsenal.
Title: Re: any news about a no latency version ?
Post by: dj! on September 09, 2010, 02:24:12 PM
First off, thanks for your praise!  Unfortunately changing the EQ to zero latency is a far from trivial matter.

In a nutshell the way our EQ works internally is completely different from "other" EQs--this is what makes the variable phase, different EQ curves, and dynamic behavior possible in the first place.  However it also means that the latency was taken as a prerequisite in implementing those features.

We do have some ideas on how (some of) the functionality could be implemented with zero latency, but at this point it's a) in an experimental stage and b) not even clear whether it is fully possible at all.  Rest assured that if and when we succeed version 2 will see the light of day. :)

Thanks & take care,

-- dj!